Merger Enforcement
نویسندگان
چکیده
The challenge of effective merger enforcement is tremendous. U.S. antitrust agencies must, by statute, quickly forecast the competitive effects of mergers that occur in virtually every sector of the economy to determine if mergers can proceed. Surprisingly, given the complexity of the regulators task, there is remarkably little empirical evidence on the effects of mergers to guide regulators. This paper describes the necessity of retrospective analysis of past mergers in building an empirical basis for antitrust enforcement, and provides guidance on the key measurement issues researchers confront in estimating the price effects of mergers. We also describe how evidence from merger retrospectives can be used to evaluate the economic models used to predict the competitive effects of mergers. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission or any individual Commissioner. We would like to thank Chris Taylor for his comments.
منابع مشابه
The Merger Guidelines Commentary: Practical Guidance and Missed Opportunities
Historically, the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission have provided only limited details of their merger enforcement policies. While the various iterations of the Merger Guidelines1 provided insight into the analytical framework the agencies use to review mergers, there was little guidance illustrating how agency staff and decision makers weighe...
متن کاملMergers and Acquisitions: A Financial Economics Perspective
In this paper, I begin by describing and assessing the different criteria simple criteria used by financial economists to evaluate merger success. I then discuss the empirical evidence on mergers and acquisitions in the corporate finance literature beginning with stock return studies, moving to accounting-based studies, and finishing with some discussion of clinical studies. Next, I discuss wha...
متن کاملThe Success of Divestitures in Merger Enforcement: Evidence from the J&J-Pfizer Transaction
Despite being a widely used tool in merger enforcement, there have been few studies of whether antitrust divestitures are successful. We help fill this void by conducting a study of the divestitures relating to Johnson & Johnson’s $16.6 billion acquisition of Pfizer’s consumer health division in 2006. Six brands were divested in this matter to alleviate antitrust concern. For three of the brand...
متن کاملBureaucratic Politics and China’s Anti-Monopoly Law
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 671 R I. Why Bureaucratic Politics Matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 675 R A. Law as an Incomplete Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 676 R B. The Lack of Judicial Oversight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 677 R II....
متن کامل1982 Merger Guidelines
1 be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly." 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 (1981). Mergers subject to section 1 are prohibited if they constitute a 2 “contract, combination... or conspiracy in restraint of trade." They replace a set of Guidelines issued by the Department in 1968, and are subject to 3 further revision in light of subsequent judicial decisions or economic studies...
متن کامل